 |
C O L U M N S
Caught in a pincer
India is ringed by hostile neighbours,
who hope to bleed and balkanise it.
India
is encountering a geopolitical pincer movement to corner
it, prior to its eventual liquidation as a significant
political entity. The principal instigator of this pincer
movement is China, which has already garlanded India
with a ring of hostile countries, itching to see it
prostrate. The garland of thorns surrounding India begins
with Bangladesh, Burma and Nepal and ends with the bleeding
dagger of Pakistan already thrust deep into India’s
body politic. Nepal’s unabashed participation in this
campaign has been held back by India’s economic stranglehold
over it, but its dominant elites are more than anxious
to plunge a dagger of their own into India’s heart.
Where Sri Lanka will fit into this equation barely requires
much imagination, despite the apparent current honeymoon,
because the Sinhalese have long harboured iridescent
contempt for India.
The other arm of this pincer, threatening India’s very
survival, is an array of Arab supporters of Pakistan
now implanted deep inside Indian society and its polity.
They apparently concur that the hiatus of British and
post-colonial kafir ascendancy in India is poised to
end. Sunni Islam is looking forward to the restoration
of their rule in a vast swathe encompassing north and
west Africa, reaching out towards the Black Sea coast
and then stretching all the way eastward to obscure
Chittagong port. And such is the Islamic self-confidence
and influence within India itself that minor coastal
Gulf statelets, with populations that would disappear
in one Indian city suburb, finance and nonchalantly
promote lethal bombing campaigns in its capital city.
The Indian state, which could easily punish these vile
Cantons militarily, utters not a whisper of protest
as the evidence of their dastardly complicity piles
ever higher.
Transnational ambitions of Islam and the Maoist revolt
have combined to tie down the Indian state well and
truly. The unfolding drama in which they are playing
a pivotal role is a prelude to delivering a coup de
grâce, at an appropriate time when the Indian
state is besieged and stretched. At that climacteric
moment of danger, India’s self-obsessed and morally
neuter elites will be susceptible to blandishments to
save their own skins in exchange for all sorts of acts
of national betrayal. The outcome is likely to be the
surrender of sovereign territory and grants of political
autonomy to seditious regions that will make the provisions
of Article 370 seem excessively centripetal.
The Islamic instrument of subversion is a remarkable,
but entirely predictable hold over their sub-continental
co-religionists. This far-reaching influence is maintained
through doctrinal and financial stranglehold over India’s
Islamic clergy and institutions. The clergy itself enjoys
immense sway over the faithful through mosques and madrasas.
In the eloquent testimony of Tehmina Durrani, the former
spouse of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s close colleague, who
laid bared the private vileness of Pakistan’s ruling
elites, “The multitudes might be impoverished and illiterate,
but invoke the name of Islam – no matter how erroneously
- and they will rally.” As a result, India’s Islamic
clergy is able to brazenly announce its loyalty to the
wider ummah and the imperative of establishing a caliphate
in the future, where non-Muslims, according to Jamaat
leaders, will be suitably deferential.
The pincer movement against India distending ominously
along its borders is combined with manifold domestic
dissent and policy stasis, accentuating the impulse
toward implosion. The selfsame foes, sitting animatedly
along its borders, assiduously sponsor a great deal
of this internal political discontent within India.
Characteristically, the Left parties across the country
are embarked on a truly insidious campaign of criminal
sabotage of their own on all fronts. They have joined
hands with China and jihadi Pakistan to ensure the failure
of the Indo-US accord on nuclear energy. The Iran issue
in the IAEA is merely an excuse since the real goal
is to advance the interests of communist China, to which
Pakistan happens to be joined at the proverbial hip.
Quire revealingly, India’s erstwhile foreign minister
engaged in a disgraceful subterfuge by unilaterally
stopping India from co-sponsoring a resolution to institutionalise
the commemoration of the Holocaust at the UN. This was
a pernicious and crude play for Leftist and Islamic
sympathy to protect himself from the consequences of
being named in the Volcker Report. But it is not a surprise
that the Left and their Islamic co-conspirators refuse
to commemorate the Holocaust because anti-Semitism has
become their triumphant hallmark. The self-indulgent
foreign minister himself gave no thought to India’s
good name and its important relationship with Israel
in perpetrating this shameful act of betrayal, which
also happens to be contrary to avowed government policy.
Yet, he remains a member of the Union Cabinet, with
the zealous support of the political Left, and the honourable
prime minister does not find the situation intolerable.
Of course, rotten governance and devilish economic
mismanagement are also playing a diabolical role in
undermining India’s advance. The government’s overweening
presence in the economy constantly politicises economic
disquiet and drags it into every contentious issue.
In a largely impersonal private economy the political
system would be more insulated from the daily ebb and
flow of economic events that affect personal destinies.
Economic setbacks would not rapidly translate into collective
political discontent and revolt. But the collaborationist
and criminal political class only has the short-term
goal of securing political power and the spoils of office,
with which reform has minimal connection. Yet, it is
the Left’s impact on current economic policy that is
proving extraordinarily damaging to India’s future,
though the Nehruvian economic legacy has contaminated
political parties right across the ideological spectrum.
Continued
Part II
Dr Gautam Sen formerly taught at the
London School of Economics & Political Science.
|